28 Comments

If Randi Weingarten and Michael Mulgrew were sincere about hearing retirees and opposing Medicare Advantage they would be lobbying for state and city legislation to preserve Medicare and Medicare supplement at no cost to UFT retirees.

They would be writing columns in the Teacher and NYSUT publication opposing dumping their retirees into Medicare Advantage.They would be filing briefs opposing the City’s cases to dump retirees into Medicare Advantage and opposing co-pays which is another way of increasing retiree health care costs.

But they are not. Their silence is deafening.

Expand full comment
author

Yes I couldn't agree more. We get to vote in UFT next year. And when we win, we'll have votes at AFT too.

Expand full comment
Jul 20Liked by Arthur Goldstein

In court this week, both emblem, and the city of New York said that retirees are just complaining about co-pays because active workers don’t complain at all about their co-pays!

Maybe active workers don’t realize their union leader led the way to impose co-pays on everyone

Maybe they didn’t know that healthcare is a mandatory subject of bargaining and they have a say!

Expand full comment
author

There's a story about two Russian farmers. One says, "My neighbor has a cow and I don't. I want his cow to die." This is how we're expected to think. This is how our union leaders encourage us to think. Well, this sort of thought is not union. We need to educate our fellow unionists, especially those in-service.

Expand full comment
Jul 20Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Thank you for writing this, Arthur. Everything you're describing, I witnessed firsthand. I was a member of Unity Caucus for a few years, and worked as a UFT PM staffer in the UFT D75 Office for about 3 years. I left Unity Caucus a year ago, because of my ethical concerns around healthcare, lack of democratic processes within our union, and divisive/dishonest rhetoric espoused by Unity members who are also UFT employees paid with our dues money. I was fired from my UFT PM staffer job about 2 weeks after leaving Unity. No reason was given, but there had never been an issue with my job performance. I was fired because I no longer agreed to be a member of Michael Mulgrew's Unity Caucus.

The Unity Caucus certainly operates as a rigid hierarchy, with Mulgrew on top. Anyone who doesn't fall in line is branded a liability, and is fired altogether or banished to a cubicle in a remote location-- or to a cubicle where they can be closely watched. A lot of people in Unity don't like or trust Mulgrew and his inner-circle, but they know if they say anything they'll simply be removed and replaced. Mulgrew is paranoid, power-hungry, and vindictive. He lies to UFT members' faces without a second thought, and he is selling out the rights and benefits that we earned through decades of union organizing and decades of public service. Mulgrew and his Unity Caucus enablers are unfit to lead the UFT, and we must all work together to vote them out. I am very confident that UFT members of conscience will defeat Mulgrew/Unity in the upcoming general election, and we will make our UFT truly democratic, proactive and so much stronger than it is now.

Expand full comment
author
Jul 20·edited Jul 20Author

Thanks for your comment, Chad. Your firsthand experience speaks volumes. It's terrible that someone as articulate and thoughtful as you is dumped for the egregious offense of not drinking the Kool-Aid. It's also terrible that we're compelled to pay the salaries of people who do nothing BUT drink it.

Expand full comment
Jul 20Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Mulgrew doesn’t know retirees haven’t fallen for him smoke & mirrors statement of not backing Advantage care for retirees. He’s concerned about his re-election. Read yesterday there is a UFT exec. thinking of running for Bob Holden’s seat upon his retirement . UFT infiltrating NYC Council to get Advantage passed?

Expand full comment
author

One vote won't do it. And the current UFT position, unilaterally given by the Great Leader, is we don't support it. So we'll see what happens with Dermot.

Expand full comment

Oh my, it’s Dermot Smyth who’s running. Dermot told me, over 13 years ago, when he became a special rep that he wants to change the union from within. Was I supposed to infer that the $187,786 he’s getting in UFT patronage money had nothing to do with his leaving his full time day job of teaching to change the union from within? I haven’t seen any change from within since he came on board. Looks like he’s going on a grab for another gold ring 🥇 at NY City Council. Another one of those screws with no threads.

Expand full comment
Jul 21Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Thanks for being so supportive!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for your kind comment.

Expand full comment
Jul 20Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Years ago, I remember our chapter leader emailing Mulgrew about issues that came up and then she got a message from one of his minions that she was emailing him too much and to stop emailing him.

Expand full comment
author

That's hilarious. And sad too.

Expand full comment
Jul 22Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Do a deep dive on Albert Shanker and the origin story of the UFT.

Shanker is not the "nice guy" that the UFT makes him out to be.

https://jacobin.com/2018/09/ocean-hill-brownsville-strike-united-federation-teachers-new-york-community-control/

Expand full comment
author

I actually read a book called The Teacher Rebellion by David Selden. There was quite a bit there about Shanker, and he was certainly not portrayed as a nice guy.

Expand full comment
Jul 22Liked by Arthur Goldstein

Thank you for sharing this. Im lookimg for the book right now. 🙏

Expand full comment
author

It's been out of print forever. I think I found a used copy on Amazon.

Expand full comment
Jul 22Liked by Arthur Goldstein

I just scored the book on internet archive. Thank you!

Expand full comment
author

You will like it.

Expand full comment

We're so fortunate that you are one of our Retiree Vice Chair Leaders. While Mulgrew and his Unity loyalists have built in ways to restrict the power of non-Unity elected and the RA team (especially after such an historic win!) -your words continue to travel -and effectively so! We're all learning to distinguish between frauds and those who take lives and the meaning of union to heart! TY for being on such a roll!!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Laura. I appreciate your encouragement.

Expand full comment

Arthur, keep writing- it’s more important than you may realize.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks so much! I appreciate that.

Expand full comment

What are next steps?

Expand full comment
author

I'm thinking we win the election next year and take over the union. I also think it's important to defeat Trump, who will come after Medicare and public schools.

Expand full comment

Dermot Smyth running for NY City Council District 30.

Dermot is the holder of a Unity patronage position at $187,786 per annum.

Adheres to the Unity ie Mulgrew doctrine.

https://queensledger.com/2024/07/17/dermot-smyth-declares-candidacy-for-district-30-seat/

Expand full comment
author

At that salary, a person votes however Mulgrew says. It would be nice if we, the lowly members, had the remotest notions what that would mean for, say, protecting Medicare.

Expand full comment
RemovedJul 21
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

Actually tthe City Council protected 12-126, but turned down our request to protect Medicare and a supplement. The state seemed to support us, but didn't bring it to a vote, citing union opposition. Hopefully we can fix that. To do so, we need Mulgrew to act rather than talk.

Expand full comment